leroy

1.3 Sublocals

Definition 5 Nucleus
#

A nucleus is a map \(e : O(E) \rightarrow O(E)\) with the following three properties:

  1. \(e\) is idempotent

  2. \(U \le e U\)

  3. \(e(U \cap V) = e(U) \cap e(V)\)

Lemma 6 Nucleus

(Leroy Lemme 3) Let \(e : O(E) \rightarrow O(E)\) be monotonic. The following are equivalent:

  1. \(e\) is a nucleus

  2. There is a locale \(X\) and a morphism \(f: X \rightarrow E\) such that \(e = f_*f^*\).

  3. Then there is a locale \(X\) and a embedding \(f: X \rightarrow E\) such that \(e = f_*f^*\).

Proof
Definition 7 Nucleus Partial Order
#

For two nuclei \(e\) and \(f\) on \(O(E)\), we say that \(e \le f\) if \(e(U) \le f(U)\) for all \(U \in O(E)\). This relation is a partial order.

Lemma 8 Nucleus Intersection

For a set \(S\) of nuclei, the intersection \(\bigcap S\) can be computed by \(\bigcap S(a) = \bigcap \{ j(a) | j \in S \} \). This function satisfies the properties of a nucleus and of an infimum.
Quelle: StoneSpaces S.51

Proof
Definition 9 Sublocal
#

(Leroy CH 3) A sublocal \(Y \subset X\) is defined by a nucleus \(e_Y: O(X) \rightarrow O(X)\), such that \(O(Y) = Im(e_Y) = \{ U \in O(X) | e_Y(U) = U\} \). The corresponding embedding is \(i_X : O(Y) \rightarrow O(X)\). \(i^*_X(V) = e_X(V)\), \((i_X)_*(U) = U\) And every nucleus \(e\) on \(O(X)\) defines a sublocal \(Y\) of \(X\) by \(O(Y) = Im(e)\)

Definition 10 Sublocal Inclusion
#

(Stimmt das?)(Leroy Ch 3) \(X \subset Y\) if \(e_Y(u) \le e_X(u)\) for all \(u\). This means that the Sublocals are a dual order to the nuclei.

1.3.1 (1.4) Sublocal Union and Intersection

Definition 11 Union of Sublocals

(Leroy CH 1.4) Let \((X_i)_i\) be a family of sublocals of \(E\) and \((e_i)_i\) the corresponding nuclei. For all \(V \in O(E)\), let \(e(V)\) be the union of all \(W \in O(E)\) which are contained in all \(e_i(V)\).

Lemma 12 Union of Sublocals
#

(Leroy CH 4) Let \(X_i\) be a family of subframes of \(E\) and \(e_i\) be the corresponding nuclei. For every \(V \in O(E)\), let \(e(V)\) be the union of all \(W \in O(E)\) which are contained in every \(e_i(V)\). Then

  1. \(e\) is the corresponding nucleus of a sublocale \(X\) of \(E\)

  2. a sublocale \(Z\) of \(E\) contains \(x\) if and only if it contains all \(X_i\). \(X\) is thus called the union of \(X_i\) denoted by \(\bigcup _i X_i\)

Proof

The properties of the nucleus (idempotent, increasing, preserving intersection) can be verified by unfolding the definition of \(e(V)\).

Definition 13 Intersection of Sublocals
#

Let \((X_i)_i\) be a family of sublocal of \(E\) and \((e_i)_i\) the corresponding nuclei. For all \(V \in O(E)\), the intersection \(\bigcap X_i\) is the Union of all Nuclei \(w\) such that \(w \le x_i \) for all \(x_i \in X_i \)

Lemma 14 Nucleus Complete Lattice
#

The Nuclei (and therefore the sublocals) form a complete lattice.

Proof

One can prove that the Nuclei are closed under arbitrary intersections by unfolding the definition of the intersection. The supremum is defined as the infimum of the upper Bound.

Proposition 15 Complete Heyting Algebra
#

A complete Lattice is a Frame if and only if it as a Heyting Algebra.

Proof

(Source Johnstone:) The Heyting implication is right adjoint to the infimum. This means that the infimum preserves Suprema, since it is a left adjoint.

Lemma 16 Nucleus Heyting Algebra
#

The Nuclei form a Heyting Algebra.

Proof

Quelle Johnstone

Lemma 17 Nucleus Frame

The Nuclei form a frame.

Proof

1.3.2 (7) Open Sublocals

Definition 18 \(e_U\)

Let \(E\) be a space with \(U, H \in O(E)\). We donote by \(e_U\) the largest \(W \in O(E)\) such that \(W \cap U \subset H\). We verify that \(e_U\) is the nucleus of a subspace, which we will temporarily denote by \([U]\).

Lemma 19 \(e_U\) is a nucleus
#

The map \(e_U\) is a nucleus.

Proof
Definition 20 Open sublocal
#

For any \(U \in O(E)\), the sublocal \([U]\) is called an open sublocal of \(E\).

Lemma 21 (6,7) Open Sublocal Properties
#

(Leroy Lemma 6,7)

  1. For all subspaces \(X\) of \(E\) and any \(U \in O(E)\):

    \[ X \subset [U] \iff e_X(U) = 1_E \]
  2. For all \(U, V \in O(E)\), we have:

    \[ [U \cap V] = [U] \cap [V] \]
    \[ e_{U \cap V} = e_Ue_V=e_Ve_U \]
    \[ U \subset V \iff [U] \subset [V] \]
  3. For all families \(V_i\) of elements of \(O(E)\), we have:

    \[ \cup _i[V_i] = [\cup _iV_i] \]
Proof
Definition 22 Complement
#

The complement of an open sublocal \(U\) of \(X\) is the sublocal \(X \setminus U\). (Leroy p. 12)

Lemma 23 Complement Injective
#

The complement is injective.

Proof
Definition 24 Closed Sublocal
#

A sublocal \(X\) of \(E\) is called closed if \(X = E \setminus U\) for some open sublocal \(U\) of \(E\).

Lemma 25 Intersection of Closed Sublocals
#

For any family \(X_i\) of closed sublocals of \(E\), the intersection \(\bigcap X_i\) is closed (it can be computed by taking the complement of the union of the complements).

Proof
Lemma 26 (1.8) Properties of Complements

For any open sublocal \(V\) of \(E\) and any sublocal \(X\) of \(E\), we have:

\[ V \cup X = E \iff E \setminus V subset X \]
\[ V \cap X = \emptyset \iff X \subset E \setminus V \]

And thereby:

\[ (E - U = E - V) \implies U = V \]
Proof
Lemma 27 (1.8bis) Properties of Complements Part 2
#

For any open sublocal \(V\) of \(E\) and any sublocal \(X\) of \(E\), we have:

\[ V \cup (E - V) = E \iff V \subset X \]
\[ V \cap (E - V) = \emptyset X \subset V \]
Proof
Definition 28 Further Topology
  1. \(Int X\) is the largest open sublocal contained in \(X\)

  2. \(Ext X\) is the largest open sublocal contained in \(E \setminus X\)

  3. \(\bar{X}\) is the smallest closed sublocal containing \(X\)

  4. \(\partial X = \bar{X} \cap (E - Int X)\)

Lemma 29 Properties of Further Topology
  1. \(\bar{X} = E \setminus Ext(X)\)

  2. \(\partial X = E \setminus (Int X \cup Ext X)\)

  3. \(Int X \cup \partial X = \bar X\)

  4. \(Ext X \cup \partial X = E \setminus Int X\)

Proof