Deriving a proof of false #
linarith
uses an untrusted oracle to produce a certificate of unsatisfiability.
It needs to do some proof reconstruction work to turn this into a proof term.
This file implements the reconstruction.
Main declarations #
The public facing declaration in this file is proveFalseByLinarith
.
Auxiliary functions for assembling proofs #
A typesafe version of mulExpr
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
mulExpr n e
creates an Expr
representing n*e
.
When elaborated, the coefficient will be a native numeral of the same type as e
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
A type-safe analogue of addExprs
.
Equations
- Linarith.addExprs' _inst x = match x with | [] => q(0) | h :: t => Linarith.addExprs'.go _inst h t
Instances For
Inner loop for addExprs'
.
Equations
- Linarith.addExprs'.go _inst p [] = p
- Linarith.addExprs'.go _inst p [q] = q(«$p» + «$q»)
- Linarith.addExprs'.go _inst p (q :: t) = Linarith.addExprs'.go _inst q(«$p» + «$q») t
Instances For
addExprs L
creates an Expr
representing the sum of the elements of L
, associated left.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
If our goal is to add together two inequalities t1 R1 0
and t2 R2 0
,
addIneq R1 R2
produces the strength of the inequality in the sum R
,
along with the name of a lemma to apply in order to conclude t1 + t2 R 0
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
mkLTZeroProof coeffs pfs
takes a list of proofs of the form tᵢ Rᵢ 0
,
paired with coefficients cᵢ
.
It produces a proof that ∑cᵢ * tᵢ R 0
, where R
is as strong as possible.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
step c pf npf coeff
assumes that pf
is a proof of t1 R1 0
and npf
is a proof
of t2 R2 0
. It uses mkSingleCompZeroOf
to prove t1 + coeff*t2 R 0
, and returns R
along with this proof.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
If prf
is a proof of t R s
, leftOfIneqProof prf
returns t
.
Equations
- Linarith.leftOfIneqProof prf = do let __do_lift ← Lean.Meta.inferType prf let __discr ← Linarith.getRelSides __do_lift match __discr with | (t, snd) => pure t
Instances For
If prf
is a proof of t R s
, typeOfIneqProof prf
returns the type of t
.
Equations
- Linarith.typeOfIneqProof prf = do let __do_lift ← Linarith.leftOfIneqProof prf Lean.Meta.inferType __do_lift
Instances For
mkNegOneLtZeroProof tp
returns a proof of -1 < 0
,
where the numerals are natively of type tp
.
Equations
- Linarith.mkNegOneLtZeroProof tp = do let zero_lt_one ← Lean.Meta.mkAppOptM `zero_lt_one #[some tp, none, none, none, none, none] Lean.Meta.mkAppM `neg_neg_of_pos #[zero_lt_one]
Instances For
addNegEqProofs l
inspects the list of proofs l
for proofs of the form t = 0
. For each such
proof, it adds a proof of -t = 0
to the list.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
- Linarith.addNegEqProofs [] = pure []
Instances For
proveEqZeroUsing tac e
tries to use tac
to construct a proof of e = 0
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
The main method #
proveFalseByLinarith
is the main workhorse of linarith
.
Given a list l
of proofs of tᵢ Rᵢ 0
,
it tries to derive a contradiction from l
and use this to produce a proof of False
.
An oracle is used to search for a certificate of unsatisfiability.
In the current implementation, this is the Fourier Motzkin elimination routine in
Elimination.lean
, but other oracles could easily be swapped in.
The returned certificate is a map m
from hypothesis indices to natural number coefficients.
If our set of hypotheses has the form {tᵢ Rᵢ 0}
,
then the elimination process should have guaranteed that
1.\ ∑ (m i)*tᵢ = 0
,
with at least one i
such that m i > 0
and Rᵢ
is <
.
We have also that
2.\ ∑ (m i)*tᵢ < 0
,
since for each i
, (m i)*tᵢ ≤ 0
and at least one is strictly negative.
So we conclude a contradiction 0 < 0
.
It remains to produce proofs of (1) and (2). (1) is verified by calling the discharger
tactic
of the LinarithConfig
object, which is typically ring
. We prove (2) by folding over the
set of hypotheses.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.