Banach Tarski

2 Doubling a Sphere

2.1 Sphere

Definition 8 Unit Sphere without Center
#

Let \(L = \{ (x,y,z) : x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \leq 1\} \) be the unit sphere. We define \(L' = L \setminus \{ (0,0,0)\} \) as the unit sphere without its center.

Definition 9 Orbit

Two points \(a\) and \(b\) belong to the same orbit if and only if there exists a \(\rho \) in \(G\) such that \(\rho (a) = b\).

Lemma 10 Countability of All Orbits

The set of all orbits is countable.

Proof
Lemma 11 Representative Points

We can select a representative point from each orbit.

Proof

This follows directly from the Axiom of Choice.

Definition 12 Set of All Representatives
#

Let \(M\) denote the set of all chosen representative points.

We can now reach every point in \(L'\) by applying a rotation from \(G\) to a specific element in \(M\).

2.2 Duplicating a Part of the Unit Sphere

We desire that each point in \(L'\) is reached by only one rotation in \(G\). Therefore, we decompose \(L'\) according to the rotations that map to a point. A point that is mapped by multiple rotations may belong to multiple sets.

Definition 13 Fixed Points
#

Let \(Y\) be a set and \(f: Y \rightarrow Y\) a function. A point \(y \in Y\) is called a fixed point if it satisfies \(f(y) = y\).

Definition 14 Set of All Fixed Points

Let \(D\) denote the set of all points in \(L'\) that are fixed points of the rotations in \(G\).

Lemma 15 Countability of G

\(G\) is countable.

Proof
Definition 16 Exactly One Rotation Axis
#

Each rotation in \(G\) has exactly one rotation axis.

Lemma 17 Countability of Rotation Axes

The rotation axes lie on countably many lines.

Proof

Therefore, almost every point in \(L'\) can be reached by a specific rotation. We now consider a decomposition of \(L' \setminus D\) and will address the fixed points later.

Definition 18 Union X

\(X = \bigcup \limits _{k=1}^{\infty } A^{-k} M\). Thus, \(X\) is the set of all elements of \(M\) that consist solely of rotations by \(A^{-1}\).

Definition 19 Decomposition into Sets
\begin{align*} P_1 & = S(A)M \cup M \cup X \\ P_2 & = S(A^{-1})M \setminus X \\ P_3 & = S(B)M \\ P_4 & = S(B^{-1})M \end{align*}
Lemma 20 Union of the Decomposition

\(L' \setminus D = P_1 \cup P_2 \cup P_3 \cup P_4\)

Proof
Lemma 21 Rotation of Decomposed Sets
\begin{align*} A P_2 & = P_2 \cup P_3 \cup P_4 \\ B P_4 & = P_1 \cup P_2 \cup P_4 \end{align*}
Proof
Lemma 22 Doubling of L’ D
\begin{align*} L’ \setminus D & = P_1 \cup A P_2 \\ L’ \setminus D & = P_3 \cup B P_4 \end{align*}
Proof
Lemma 23 Countability of the Set of Representative Points

The set of representative points is countable.

Proof

We now have a decomposition that allows us to duplicate the sphere, excluding its center and the points on the rotation axes.

2.3 Fixed Points and the Center

Definition 24 Equidecomposability
#

Two sets \(C\) and \(D\) are called equidecomposable if \(C\) can be partitioned into finitely many pieces, which can be rearranged through rotations and translations to form \(D\).

Lemma 25 Equidecomposability of \(L' \setminus D\) and \(L'\)

\(L' \setminus D\) and \(L'\) are equidecomposable.

Proof

Since the points in \(D\) lie on countably many axes, we can find a line \(l\) through the origin that does not intersect \(D\). Furthermore, there exists an angle \(\theta \) such that a rotation by \(\theta \) around \(l\) does not map any point in \(D\) onto another point in \(D\). Define \(E = D \cup \rho (D) \cup \rho ^2(D) \cup \rho ^3(D) \cup \dots \). It follows immediately that \(L' = E \cup (L' \setminus E)\), which is equidecomposable with \(\rho (E) \cup (L' \setminus E)\). From the definition of \(E\), we obtain \(\rho (E) = E \setminus D\), so that we get \(\rho (E) \cup (L' \setminus E) = (E \setminus D) \cup (L' \setminus E) = L' \setminus D\). Thus, it follows that \(L'\) is equidecomposable with \(L' \setminus D\).

Now that we know that \(L' \setminus D\) is equidecomposable with \(L'\), the fixed points of the rotations in \(G\) are no longer an issue. Hence, we now focus on the center.

Lemma 26 Pi and Square Root of 2 Have No Common Multiple

\(\nexists p,q\in \mathbb {Z}\) such that \(\sqrt{2} \cdot \frac{p}{q} = \pi \)

Proof

Assume that there exist \(p,q\in \mathbb {Z}\) such that \(\sqrt{2} \cdot \frac{p}{q} = \pi \). By the definition of \(\cos ^{-1}\) on the interval \([0,2\pi )\), we have \(\cos ^{-1}(-1) = \pi \) and thus

\[ \cos ^{-1}(-1) = \sqrt{2} \cdot \frac{p}{q}. \]

This is equivalent to \(-1 = \cos (\sqrt{2} \cdot \frac{p}{q})\). Using the Taylor series expansion of cosine, we would obtain:

\[ \sum _{n=0}^{\infty } \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n)!} (2 \cdot \frac{p^2}{q^2})^n = -1. \]

This contradicts the properties of rational approximations, proving the claim.

Lemma 27 Equidecomposability of a Circle

A circle is equidecomposable with a circle minus a single point.

Proof

We consider the unit circle \(S^1 = \{ (x,y) : x^2 + y^2 = 1\} \) minus the point \((1,0)\). We use the unit circle to simplify notation, but the following argument can be applied to any circle. Define \(A = \{ (\cos n, \sin n) : n \in \mathbb {Z}\} \). Since \(\pi \) is irrational, we have \((\cos n, \sin n) \neq (\cos m, \sin m)\) for all distinct \(n, m \in \mathbb {Z}\). Thus, \(A\) is countably infinite and does not contain \((1,0)\). Let \(B = (S^1 \setminus \{ (1,0)\} ) \setminus A\). Now, rotate \(A\) about the origin by one unit. Denote the rotated set by \(A'\). This rotation maps \((\cos 1, \sin 1)\) to \((1,0)\), which is exactly the missing point. Since every point originally in \(A\) is still present in \(A'\), we obtain \(A' = A \cup \{ (1,0)\} \), and thus \(S^1 \setminus \{ (1,0)\} = A \cup B\) is equidecomposable with \(A' \cup B = S^1\).

Lemma 28 Equidecomposability of a Subset
Proof
Theorem 29 Equidecomposability of a Sphere

A sphere minus its center is equidecomposable with the complete sphere.

Proof

Constructing a circle within the sphere that includes the center of the sphere, together with Lemma 27, shows that the sphere minus its center is equidecomposable with the complete sphere.

2.4 The Final Proof

Having gathered all the necessary details, we can now establish the full paradox.

Theorem 30 Banach-Tarski

A sphere is equidecomposable with two copies of itself.

Proof

In the second subsection, we showed that the sphere minus its center and the points on the rotation axes is equidecomposable with two copies of itself. Using Lemma 25, it follows that the sphere minus its center is equidecomposable with two copies of itself. Finally, by Theorem 29, the complete sphere is equidecomposable with two copies of itself.